Tilden v. Board of Supervisors
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Sixth Judicial District, Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1DissentCrockett, J.
The plaintiff was the City Attorney of the City of Sacramento, and, in his official capacity, conducted certain prosecutions for violations of the laws of the State and other prosecutions for violations of city ordinances. Claiming that he was entitled to be paid for these services by the County of Sacramento, under the statutes then in force, he made out his account against the county and presented the same to the Board of Supervisors for allowance. In the account he claimed to be entitled to the sum of four hundred and sixty-one dollars, for prosecutions for violations of the laws of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Perry v. WashburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Fowler v. PeirceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852
- People Ex Rel. Fiedler v. MeadNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
- Hull v. SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1821
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.