Legal Opinion

Mims v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 1921No. 6073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was allotted five years in. the penitentiary under a conviction for manslaughter.

The motion for new trial alleges the court in several instances erred with reference to testimony and refers to bills of exception, but there are no bills of exception in the record. The only ground that needs revision is the refusal of the court to grant a new trial on account of newly discovered testimony. His application for a new trial is verified by his own affidavit that he was not aware of the testimony of the absent witness until after his conviction, and in general…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API