Legal Opinion

Migues's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

These two cases were argued together. There is no dispute that the decree for the physician must be affirmed if the employee is entitled to a decree.

The employee’s case is governed by the decision in McLaughlin’s Case, 274 Mass. 217. It was there decided that an employee, hired in Massachusetts, was entitled to compensation under G. L. c. 152 (the workmen’s compensation act), if he were sent to work in New Hampshire, were there injured, and there accepted compensation under the New Hampshire law and gave a release to the insurer of all demands; provided he had not given notice as required by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. McLaughlin's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Saharceski v. MarcureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mizrahi's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Grenier v. Alta Crest Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API