State v. Layman, 22307 (2-22-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether a trial judge who agrees to impose a negotiated sentence is bound by that agreement, even though the defendant fails to appear for sentencing at the appointed time. Reluctantly, we answer "yes."
{¶ 2} On April 9, 2007, Michael Layman entered a guilty plea to fifth degree felony breaking and entering. The trial judge "approve[d] and accept[ed]" the agreement between Layman and the State that if a sentence were imposed, it would not exceed seven months. After pleading guilty, Layman's bond was reduced and he was released from custody…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BurtonOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Bonner, Unpublished Decision (11-15-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. GilroyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. BlackburnOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. MillsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.