United States v. Exxon Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court per curiam.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.
2Per curiam
These are appeals from a District Court order of December 19, 1979 enforcing identical administrative subpoenas duces tecum against three oil companies: Exxon Corporation, Shell Oil Company, and Marathon Oil Company. We affirm the District Court’s enforcement of the subpoenas, subject to a protective order as discussed below.
On May 9, 1978 Congress passed the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. (Supp.1979), Title III of which directs the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Federal Trade Commission v. Invention Submission CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jack Lavin and Robin LavinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Fitch Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. John P. McGoff Global Communications Corp., Sacramento Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.