Legal Opinion

United States v. Exxon Corp.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 25, 1980No. Nos. 80-1002, 80-1003 and 80-1018PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court per curiam.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.

2Per curiam

These are appeals from a District Court order of December 19, 1979 enforcing identical administrative subpoenas duces tecum against three oil companies: Exxon Corporation, Shell Oil Company, and Marathon Oil Company. We affirm the District Court’s enforcement of the subpoenas, subject to a protective order as discussed below.

On May 9, 1978 Congress passed the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. (Supp.1979), Title III of which directs the Secretary of Energy, in consultation with…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. BrimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Invention Submission CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jack Lavin and Robin LavinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Fitch Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. John P. McGoff Global Communications Corp., Sacramento Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API