Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 9, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00047Unknown
1Opinion
Case 2:20-cv-00047-DWL Document 406 Filed 09/09/21 Page 1 of 54 1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-20-00047-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 James D. Noland, Jr., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 In this action, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) alleges that Defendants 16 James “Jay” Noland (“Noland”), Lina Noland, Thomas Sacca (“Sacca”), and Scott Harris 17 (“Harris”) (together, the “Individual Defendants”) operated a business venture called 18 Success by Health (“SBH”), as well as a related travel…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- American Title Insurance Company v. Lacelaw CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.