Legal Opinion
Tamagno v. Conley
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 2, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
This is an action of tort in two counts, the first to recover for the death of the plaintiff's intestate, Anthony Tamagno, under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 229, § 5, as amended, and the second under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 229, § 6, as amended, to recover for his conscious suffering. At the close of the evidence the judge ordered verdicts for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted.
The evidence may be summarized as follows. The plaintiff's intestate, aged sixty-nine years, while crossing St. Botolph Street in Boston, was knocked down by an automobile owned and operated, by the defendant. There was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foley v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Marcienowski v. SandersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Whalen v. MutrieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Cuddyer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- O'Brien v. BernoiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Blackman v. Miami Transit CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Barow v. ModoonoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Spano v. Wilson Tisdale Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- LaPlante v. MaguireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Gustafson v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.