LaPlante v. Maguire
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The plaintiff joined two independent operators of automobiles as defendants in an action of tort to recover for personal injuries and damage to 'his automobile, as permitted by G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 4A, inserted by St. 1943, c. 350, § 1. Goff v. Hickson, 322 Mass. 655. The plaintiff recovered against the defendant Joseph R. Lamothe for both personal injuries and property damage. The defendant Maguire had a verdict in his favor. The plaintiff alleged exceptions, which relate wholly to questions of evidence.
*97The evidence for the plaintiff may be summarized as follows. He was operating his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CapalboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Marcienowski v. SandersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Whalen v. MutrieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Stowe v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Abele v. DietzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ValliereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Federico v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Furtado v. LevraultMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Glidden v. Colby Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1977