Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Patterson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 2002No. COA01-448Published

1DissentGreene, Judge

I dissent because I believe the trial court erred in considering for sentencing purposes information contained in records that had not been presented into evidence either at trial or at the sentencing hearing. As to the remainder of the majority opinion, however, I fully concur.

Although the formal rules of evidence do not apply in a sentencing hearing, such a hearing “must be fair and just” and provide the defendant with an “effective way of contradicting [any] damaging and prejudicial information.” State v. Locklear, 34 N.C. App. 37, 39-40, 237 S.E.2d 289, 291 (1977), rev’d on other grounds,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. MidyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. FloweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. LocklearCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API