Legal Opinion

Dieck v. A.B. Volvo Penta, Sweden

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1991No. 90-C-2210PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRY, Judge.

Applicant, A.B. Volvo Penta, Sweden, argues that the trial court erred by granting Gene Jackson’s motion to disqualify its law firm which briefly represented Mr. Jackson and Volvo. We grant this application in order to consider the validity of that judgment.

On October 16, 1987 Carl L. Dieck filed suit for damages against Volvo (engine manufacturer), W.A.R. Marine Services and Louisiana Power House, Inc. (distributors of the engines), and Gene Jackson (owner of W.A.R. Marine Services). On November 12, 1987 Volvo answered and cross-claimed against Louisiana Power House, W.A.R.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. La Nasa v. FortierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altman v. RumbolzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Interdiction of CharltonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Dieck v. A.B. Volvo Penta, SwedenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API