Legal Opinion

Interdiction of Charlton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 11, 1992No. 92-CC-3044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The trial court’s ruling which disqualified A.D. Freeman, A. Albert Ajubita, and Byron Ann Cook as attorneys in these proceedings is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court.

The harsh consequence of disqualification is not warranted merely because an attorney-client relationship existed between a former client and an attorney who presently represents a subsequent client. Dieck v. A.B. Volvo Penta, Sweden, 577 So.2d 297 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991). As out-hned in Rule 1.9 of the Rules of Professional Conduct,1 the proper focus is whether the matters are the same or substantially related…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. de la Vergne v. de la VergneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. La Nasa v. FortierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Dieck v. A.B. Volvo Penta, SwedenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. McClanahan v. HamiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API