Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hanson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1901No. S.F. No. 2641PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Appeal from an order approving and settling the administrator’s account. The only part of the account drawn in question is the following item: “Mrs. P. H. McClelland, pies, cakes, soups, etc., $208.00”; which the court allowed as a proper charge. Letters were issued to the public administrator, and the sole heir at law of the deceased filed written objections to the above item. There is no brief for the respondent. The only witness sworn at the hearing in explanation of the charge was the claimant, Mrs. McClelland. She testified with entire frankness that she never had any…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  2. In Re the Estate of RohrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Payne v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Meredith v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API