Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Gee

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1884No. Case No. 1807PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error from Waller. Tried below before the Hon. Wm. H. Burk-hart.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice. —

It appears from the record that-Alfred Whitaker was a party defendant duly served, but it does not appear in any way that as to him the cause was dismissed.

The judgment, however, makes no disposition of the case as to him, but was rendered in favor of his co-defendants against the plaintiff. This is not such a final judgment as this court can revise, and for this reason the writ of error will have to be dismissed.

We deem it, however, proper to say that, were the judgment a final judgment, we could not revise the rulings of the court below in rejecting evidence or…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Steinhardt & Co. v. Galveston Cotton Seed Meal Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Wootters v. KauffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. De Zavala v. ScanlanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Williams v. D. H. Bell & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API