People v. Carey
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.*
In this case, we hold that the police may not “clarify” unambiguous and repeated refusals to say anything after a cus*102todial suspect has been advised of and indicates that he understands his constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974].
Leon Carnal Carey was convicted in a court trial of a plethora of serious offenses which resulted in a determinate state prison sentence of 25 years 8 months.1 He appeals, contending: “The trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress his confession.” The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986