Legal Opinion

People v. Carey

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1986No. B017051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.*

In this case, we hold that the police may not “clarify” unambiguous and repeated refusals to say anything after a cus*102todial suspect has been advised of and indicates that he understands his constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974].

Leon Carnal Carey was convicted in a court trial of a plethora of serious offenses which resulted in a determinate state prison sentence of 25 years 8 months.1 He appeals, contending: “The trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress his confession.” The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. People v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. DurenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API