Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Saint Paul v. Intermountain Bancorporation, Inc.

District Court, D. Montana

Decided June 15, 1987No. CV 86-51-M-RESPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RUSSELL E. SMITH, District Judge.

The court has diversity jurisdiction.

On January 25, 1982, Intermountain Ban-corporation (Intermountain) borrowed $3,400,000 from the First National Bank of Saint Paul (Bank), and as evidence thereof, signed a promissory note due on demand with interest payable semiannually. The note among other things provided that in the event of default of any payment of interest, or if the holder deems itself insecure, the holder may declare the entire balance unconditionally due and payable. The note contained this statement: “The note shall be deemed a contract made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API