Legal Opinion
Godlove v. Russell
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
Whether a general demurrer to the amended complaint in this action should have been sustained is the question to be decided herein. It appears from the amended, complaint that the respondents constituted a partnership under the assumed name of Russell Poultry Yards, and that they and appellant executed the following written'instrument:
“This agreement made and entered into this 16th day of March, 1929, by and between Russell Poultry Yards of Corvallis, Oregon, hereinafter designated as the Buyer, and Mr. C. W. Godlove, Eugene, Oregon, hereinafter designated as the Seller.
“Witnesseth: That the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. PallayOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Sunnyside Land Co. v. Willamette Bridge Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Dose v. ToozeOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Bussard v. HiblerOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Pacific Bridge Co. v. Oregon Hassam Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reliable Credit Ass'n v. Credithrift of America, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977