Legal Opinion

Macon, Dublin & Savannah Railroad v. Graham & Ward

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 8, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Injunction. Before Judge Foster. Laurens superior court. December 26. 1902.

1Opinion of the Court

'Simmons, C. J.

1. A common carrier can not, in this State, lawfully discriminate against one of two or more connecting carriers as to the facilities afforded or the charges made touching an interchange of freight. See Logan v. Central Railroad, 74 Ga. 684. J_So where a railway company extends its line of road to the hank of a navigable stream and there constructs a wharf and steam “hoist,” with a view to facilitating the handling of freight received from or consigned to the proprietors of steamboats plying such stream, the railway company is bound to afford the owners of competing boat lines…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Logan & Co. v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Americus Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Georgia Southwestern & Gulf Railroad v. Georgia-Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. GrangerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API