Legal Opinion
Smith v. State ex rel. Ingerman
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1889No. 13,288PublishedCited by 9 opinions
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Coffey, J. —
This was a suit in the Hamilton Circuit Court by the appellee against the appellants upon the following bond:
“We, Samuel B. Wells, J. L. Benson, S. M. Smith, A. F. Brown and F. A. Hawkins, are held and firmly bound unto the State of Indiana in the penal sum of five thousand dollars, to be levied of our good and chattels, lands and tenements, if default be made of the following conditions, to wit:
“ Whereas, by an act of the Legislature of the State of Indiana, entitled ‘An act concerning drainage,’ approved April 8th, 1881, it is provided that the circuit court of each county shall…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. MerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. AcresIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Hill v. NewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Dix v. AkersIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Racer v. State ex rel. RhineIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Studabaker v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Racer v. WingateIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Western Assurance Co. v. Studebaker Bros. Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Hogshead v. State ex rel. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.