Legal Opinion

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP v. Sutherland

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 3, 2017No. 151, 2016PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINE, Chief Justice:

This appeal concerns a dispute over when a charging lien may be imposed on a judgment to recover unpaid attorney’s fees. In this opinion, we embrace the definition that a charging lien is “an equitable right to have costs advanced and attorney’s fees secured by the judgment entered in the suit wherein the costs were advanced and the fee earned,” 1 which had been previously adopted by the Court of Chancery in its earlier decision in Zutmu v. Jansing. 2 In the matter before us, the Vice Chancellor supplemented the prerequisites for a charging lien to confíne an attorney to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doroshow, Pasquale, Krawitz & Bhaya v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
  2. ConAgra Foods, Inc. v. Lexington InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  3. Sutherland v. SutherlandCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
  4. Royal Insurance Co. v. SimonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
  5. John W. Muije, Ltd. v. a North Las Vegas Cab Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. AutoLotto, Inc. v. J. Streicher Financial, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
  2. Capstack Nashville 3, LLC v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2022
  3. Gulf Aviation Services Group WLL v. Wilmington Trust CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
  4. Luster v. PuraCap Laboratories, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
  5. Sperling & Slater v. SilkRoad, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API