United States v. Sperow
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge FISHER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Gregory Sperow appeals his conviction for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute, asserting that the post-indictment delay in his arrest amounted to a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Sperow also appeals an enhancement of his sentence, arguing that it was improperly based on a prior conviction not proven to the jury or admitted by the defendant, and that the government did not give him proper notice of its intent to seek such an enhancement. We affirm Sperow’s conviction. However,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. William WeilandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Robert ManningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Felix SeverinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Dwaine AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Jerome Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SperowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007