Legal Opinion

In re Walch

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1937No. 3745PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeNeoot, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of tire Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner,, rejecting, for lack of invention over the cited prior art, claim 16-of appellants’ application. Other claims were also involved in said decisions, but this appeal relates only to claim 16, which reads as; follows:

16. The process of separating a mixture of more than two constituents of' which one of the heavier constituents is a relatively free flowing liquid and) the other of the heavier constituents is a relatively viscous material, which.' comprises…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. New Process Fermentation Co. v. MausSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of OsplackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  2. Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API