In re Walch
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeNeoot, Judge
This is an appeal from a decision of tire Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the examiner,, rejecting, for lack of invention over the cited prior art, claim 16-of appellants’ application. Other claims were also involved in said decisions, but this appeal relates only to claim 16, which reads as; follows:
16. The process of separating a mixture of more than two constituents of' which one of the heavier constituents is a relatively free flowing liquid and) the other of the heavier constituents is a relatively viscous material, which.' comprises…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- New Process Fermentation Co. v. MausSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Application of OsplackCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938