Legal Opinion

Paul v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1904No. 4,660PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Steuben Circuit Court; S. A. Powers, Special Judge. Action by Frank S. Paul against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

The appellant, in 1888, brought an action against the Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad Company in the DeKalb Circuit Court, to recover damages for *158a personal injury alleged to have been suffered by him while in the employment of that company, through the negligent action of its agents. The cause having been’ removed, on the .application of the defendant, to the circuit court of the United States, it was remanded by that court to the DeKalb Circuit Court, upon a verified motion of the plaintiff, showing that the defendant Was a corporation formed by the consolidation of an Ohio corporation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Conley v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Cady v. Associated ColoniesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1902
  5. Combs v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byrd v. RectorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. National Life Insurance Co. of the United States v. WheelerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Bergougnan Rubber Corp. v. GregoryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API