Legal Opinion
Yuri D. Veprinsky v. Fluor Daniel, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 26, 1996No. 95-2197PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Yuri Veprinsky filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 1991 alleging that Fluor Daniel had discharged him from its employ on the basis of his national origin and religion, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He subsequently alleged in this lawsuit that Fluor Daniel had retaliated against him in several ways for filing the charge. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Fluor Daniel on two of the retaliation claims and denied Veprinsky leave to add another to his complaint, relying in part…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Thomas Flannery v. Recording Industry Association of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- 74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 359, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,983 Carmen L. Robinson Nathaniel Hawthorne, Jr., Wife and Husband v. City of Pittsburgh, Earl Buford, Craig B. Edwards James N. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Susan McKENZIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.