Marye v. Hart
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment' of foreclosure of mortgage, executed by the defendants to Emeline L. Haslam, deceased.
The mortgage was made to secure the principal and interest specified in a certain promissory note executed by the defendants to said Haslam, of even date with the-mortgage.
*292The note was for $770, payable on or before June 10, 1887, with interest at the rate of nine per cent per annum, payable monthly in advance, and in case of default in the payment of any installment of interest, the entire unpaid balance of principal and interest to become due and payable at the option of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Harralson v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Longmaid v. CoulterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Large Oil Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Smith v. State Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.