Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Frankel

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1909PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of Pittsylvania county. Decree for defendants. Complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The bill exhibited in this case by the appellants, W. R Fitzgerald and his wife, Sallie J. Fitzgerald, sets out that they were joint owners of certain valuable real and personal property in the county of Pittsylvania, and that they had been induced by fraud and misrepresentation to convey the same to one Maurice Franklin in exchange for certain real estate in the city of Chicago. The prayer of the bill is that the contract entered into between the parties and the deed carrying out the contract, dated FTovember 20, 1905, be set aside, vacated and rescinded; and that their property be restored…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Carpenter's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Grim v. ByrdSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879
  3. Hazlewood v. ForrerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Potts v. Mathieson Alkali WorksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  2. Cerriglio v. PettitSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  3. Long v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  4. Boyle v. BeltzhooverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Rafferty v. HeathSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API