Legal Opinion
Bingaman v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1993No. 92-3139PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Rilda Bingaman appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of her diversity-based wrongful death action. Bingaman v. Kansas City Power & Light Co., No. CIV. A. 88-2349-V, 1992 WL 81981 (D.Kan. Mar. 18, 1992). She contends the court erroneously concluded defendants were immune from liability under the Kansas Recreational Use Statute (KRUS), Kan.Stat. Ann. §§ 58-3201 to -3207 (1983 & Supp. 1992), which provides limited immunity to landowners who make their land available for public recreational use. We affirm in part and reverse in part.1
I
Defend…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Genco v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- David L. Klepper v. City of Milford, Kansas, and David L. Klepper v. United States of America, & Third Party and City of Milford, Kansas, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United Bank & Trust Company of Norman, Oklahoma, an Oklahoma State Banking Corporation v. The Kansas Bankers Surety Company, a Kansas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by62 opinions
- Green v. BransonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Jeffries v. State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Woodman v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Terry Neustrom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- TRUE v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.