Legal Opinion
Ogden Martin Systems of Tulsa, Inc. v. Tri-Continental Leasing Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 1990No. 86 Civ. 8008 (RWS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant, Bell Atlantic TriCon Leasing Corporation, (named as formerly known, Tri-Continental, and referred to as “TriCon”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff Ogden Martin Systems of Tulsa, Inc. and to recover on its counterclaim for transaction expenses. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is granted. Parties
Ogden Martin Tulsa (“OMT”) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Oklahoma, with its principal place of business at 2122…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Primavera Familienstifung v. AskinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Tri-County Motors, Inc. v. American Suzuki Motor Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Philips Credit Corp. v. Regent Health Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Frutico, S.A. de C.V. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Cleveland Wrecking Co. v. Hercules Construction Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.