Legal Opinion

Fairbanks-Morse Company v. Hogan

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 3, 1941No. 4-6204PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGtriefin Smith, C. J.

Ben M. Hogan’s written proposal of January 4,1937, to supply all materials and perform all labor necessary in providing a waterworks system for $32,417.25 was accepted by the incorporated town of Mammoth Spring, the work to be done according* to drawing’s and specifications referred to in the contract.

A part of the plant was to be a well 300 feet in depth, with certain appurtenances. Dennis D. Doty 2 agreed with Hogan to drill the well and supply certain items for $4,332. Fairbanks-Morse & Company 3 (October 5, 1938) sued Hogan for $1,265.54, alleging Doty was Hogan’s subcontractor, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Hope Basket CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  2. Kotchtitzky v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  3. Wilkerson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Rca Victor Company, Inc. v. DaughertySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abel of Ark. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Antrim v. McKelroySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Hutcheson v. ClappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. Parker v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API