Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Penny

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from the District Court of Noble County; before B. T. Hainer, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

This is an action to recover on am appeal bond in a forcible entry and detainer case, begun before a justice of the peace and appealed to the district court, where the plaintiff prevailed, and obtained; judgment for the restitution of the property. Suit was brought on the bond in the district court of Noble county, and on the trial of the cause, after the plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested, the defendants demurred to the evidence. The court sustained the demurrer, but afterwards on motion for new trial by plaintiff, granted a new trial.

This…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lowe v. the City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Coonradt v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  2. Brown Bridgeman v. Western Casket Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Ryndak v. SeawellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Leach v. Altus State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. English v. SevernsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API