Legal Opinion
Chambers v. Kyle
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
The first paragraph of the complaint for obstructing a ditch is based oti section 13 of the act of *207March 11th, 1867. The view we take of the case, as will4 appear in this opinion, renders a statement of this paragraph unnecessary.
The second paragraph of complaint is as folloivs :
“And, for second paragraph of complaint, plaintiff says that defendant, on or about the 15th day of September, 1874, unlawfully, negligently and wilfully obstructed a ditch running across and draining the land of defendant, in said county, hy unlawfully and negligently'feeding and fattening a large number of hogs, to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Kerns Draining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Boaz v. TateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Dowdell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- McKinsey v. BowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Gossett v. TolenIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. NorthIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Heick v. VoightIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Legler v. PaineIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Anderson v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Neff v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.