Commonwealth v. Francis
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge.
This is an appeal from a September 16, 1994 judgment of sentence for two counts of homicide by vehicle.1 Appellant, Robert Francis, raises the following issues for our review:
1. Was the evidence adduced at trial insufficient to prove the requisite elements of homicide by vehicle beyond a reasonable doubt?
2. Did the Commonwealth’s introduction of evidence at trial that Appellant had a suspended license at the time of the underlying vehicular accident and the Commonwealth’s elaboration thereon as to the number of Appellant’s license suspensions breached [sic] the Commonwealth’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. HeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. RementerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. NicotraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. CheathamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. PetrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Robert Francis v. Janet Reno, Attorney General and Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Poust v. HyltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.