Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Francis

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 20, 1995PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a September 16, 1994 judgment of sentence for two counts of homicide by vehicle.1 Appellant, Robert Francis, raises the following issues for our review:

1. Was the evidence adduced at trial insufficient to prove the requisite elements of homicide by vehicle beyond a reasonable doubt?

2. Did the Commonwealth’s introduction of evidence at trial that Appellant had a suspended license at the time of the underlying vehicular accident and the Commonwealth’s elaboration thereon as to the number of Appellant’s license suspensions breached [sic] the Commonwealth’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. HeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. RementerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. NicotraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. CheathamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. PetrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Robert Francis v. Janet Reno, Attorney General and Doris Meissner, Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  4. Poust v. HyltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API