Legal Opinion

Tanqueray Gordon & Co. v. Gordon

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 6, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, District Judge.

This is another instance of that type of-'litigation which this court, mentally at least, always refers to as the “rose cases.” In other words, we are called upon to answer Juliet’s immortal question. Beyond the confines of warranty lies a vast field of comparative merit. To make that comparison more intelligent and less odious requires more than personal trial and error. The prospective purchaser is entitled to a prospect and by the same token that prospect requires an accurate identification. It is on this theory that the law of trade-marks and trade-names. and their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Royal Baking Powder Co. v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
  2. Goldwyn Pictures Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. Hilton v. HiltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
  4. Stark v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
  5. Williams Soap Co. v. J. B. Williams Soap Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. RiceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. B. v. D. Co. v. Davega-City Radio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  3. G. F. Heublein & Bro. v. Bushmill Wine & Products Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API