Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Hamlin

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1933No. 7 Div. 969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

This is a suit by appellee against appellant seeking to recover the $200 penalty provided in Code 1923, § 9021, which section reads as follows: “The owner or holder of any recorded lien other than those specified in the preceding section, who has received payment in full or partial payments of the debt so secured by the recorded lien, must, upon request in writing, enter on the margin of the record of such recorded lien, the amount and date of such payment and the amount of the debt which remains unpaid at that date which was so secured by the recorded lien. If for thirty days…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. CrumptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Brandon v. GarlandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Royal Lumber Co. v. ElsberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Universal Credit Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HamlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API