General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Crumpton
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
This action is by. the appellee against the appellant to recover the statutory penalty for failing- to enter satisfaction, after full payment, and request in writing to do so, of a recorded mortgage or conditional sale contract, and the question to be decided is whether or not the instrument in question is a lien and within the provisions of section 9021, or a mortgage and within the provisions of section 9023.
It is the settled rule of our decisions that these statutes are highly penal and must be strictly construed. Scales v. Rosenbush Furniture Co., 212 Ala. 19, 101 So. 743; Wilkerson v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Doss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Alexander v. Mobile Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Mobile Building & Loan Ass'n v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- State v. White Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Warren v. LiddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Helburn Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Gill Printing Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Bern v. RosenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Bern v. RosenAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Webb v. LitzAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.