Legal Opinion

Metts v. Piver

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1991No. 904SC770 & 904SC837PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

This case is before this Court for the second time after a trial court has entered an order granting summary judgment for defendants. In our unpublished opinion filed 3 November 1987, we held that the evidence presented to the court evidenced genuine issues of material fact as to the negligence of each defendant in failing to diagnose plaintiff’s condition and remanded the case for trial on this issue. Defendants again moved for and were granted summary judgment on this issue and no trial was ever held. We hold that these proceedings violated our mandate, and reverse.

The general…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Britt v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Iverson v. TM One, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Southland Associates Realtors, Inc. v. MinerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re R.A.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Fox v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Diorio v. PennyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Diorio v. PennyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Metts v. PiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API