Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 20, 2016No. 1D15-4603PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is granted. Following the procedure set forth in Brooks v. State, 180 So.3d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), we reverse Thomas’s judgment and sentence in this case, and remand for the trial court to hold a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine Thomas’s competency to stand trial. As in Brooks,

If there is evidence that existed previously which supports a finding that [Thomas] was competent at the time of trial, the court may make a determination of competency, nunc pro tunc, with no change in the judgment.... However, if the court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clifton Brooks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alcazar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Pedro Juan Alcazar v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Thurman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API