Legal Opinion

Alcazar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 2016No. 1D16-2785PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is granted. We reverse petitioner’s judgment and sentence, and remand for the trial court to hold a nunc pro tunc hearing to determine petitioner’s competency to stand trial.' See Thomas v. State, 189 So.3d 331 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Brooks v. State, 180 So.3d 1094, 1096 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). As in Brooks:

If there is evidence that existed previously which supports a finding that [petitioner] was competent at the time of trial, the court may make a determination of competency, nunc pro tunc, with no change in the judgment. However,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clifton Brooks v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pedro Juan Alcazar v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API