Legal Opinion

ARNOLD v. Arnold

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1951PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*496LUSK, J.

During the oral argument a question of the jurisdiction of the court below to determine the controversy was raised from the bench. Both counsel conceded the jurisdiction. But, as jurisdiction cannot be conferred by stipulation, and, as there is new legislation affecting the subject not heretofore considered by this court, it is necessary that we express our views.

Prior to 1919 probate jurisdiction in Multnomah County, as elsewhere throughout the state, was in the first instance vested in the county court. Art. YU, § 12, Original Constitution. While county courts, sitting in probate,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Achelis v. MusgroveSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Hillman v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fox v. LasleyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Fisher v. PaineOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Putnam v. JenkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Jackson v. United States National Bank, Portland, Ore.District Court, D. Oregon · 1957
  5. Premier Products Co. v. CameronOregon Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API