Legal Opinion

Craig v. Craig

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 15, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Selden P. Spencer, Judge. (1) Tire trial court erred in refusing plaintiffs’ instruction offered at tbe close of both defendant’s case and the whole case. A will contest is a trial de novo, and the will must be proved in solemn form, as though never presented in the probate court. Not having been proved, it must fall.

Read the full summary

Error to St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Selden P. Spencer, Judge. (1) Tire trial court erred in refusing plaintiffs’ instruction offered at tbe close of both defendant’s case and the whole case. A will contest is a trial de novo, and the will must be proved in solemn form, as though never presented in the probate court. Not having been proved, it must fall. Sec. 8884, R. S. 1889; Withinton v. Withinton, 7 Mo. 592; Cravens v. Eaulconer, 28 Mo. 21; Benoist v. Murrin, 48 Mo. 54; Harris v. Hays, 53 Mo. 94; Lamb v. Helm, 56 Mo. 432; Mcllwr'ath v. Hollander, 73 Mo. 113; Norton v. Paxton, 110…

1Opinion of the Court

YALLTANT, J.-

This is a will contest. Plaintiffs are the son and «widow, defendants are the daughters of the testator. The will was admitted to probate in the probate, court of St. Louis in April, 1897, and this suit instituted soon after in the circuit court of that city. The will gives only a nominal legacy to the son, does not mention the widow, and gives substantially all the estate to the two daughters. The grounds stated in the petition to invalidate the will are, that *360the testator was of unsound mind, that the will was the result of undue influence exerted by defendants, and that it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thornton's Executors v. Thornton's HeirsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  2. Mays v. MaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Holmes v. Holloman ex rel. EdmonsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1849

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Berkemeier v. RellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  2. German Evangelical Bethel Church of Concordia v. ReithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Avaro v. AvaroSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Berst v. MoxomMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API