Legal Opinion

Berst v. Moxom

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Howell Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge. (1) Burden of proving tlie instrument rests upon defendants. They are required to show the testator was of lawful age and of sound mind, as well as the due execution of the will.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Howell Circuit Court. — Hon. W. N. Evans, Judge. (1) Burden of proving tlie instrument rests upon defendants. They are required to show the testator was of lawful age and of sound mind, as well as the due execution of the will. Harris v. Hays, 53 Mo. 96; Holton v. Cochran, 208 Mo. 410; Mowry v. Norman, 204 Mo. 189; Cowan v. Shaver, 197 Mo. 212. (2) Ordinarily burden of showing undue influence rests upon plaintiff, but if a fiduciary relation is established or some confidential relation between defendants and testator, then the burden shifts. The presence of relation of confidence…

1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.

— This action was instituted in the circuit court of Wright county to contest the will of G. H. Moxom. G. H. Moxom was ■ married twice, and both wives were living at the time of his death, which occurred in Greene county, on the 24h day of January, 1909. The appellant and the respondent, J. A. Moxom, are the children of the first marriage, and the respondents, W. J. Moxom and Eva Moxom, are children of the second marriage, and the respondent, Harriet Moxom was the second wife and the mother of the respondents, W. J. Moxom and Eva Moxom.

G. H. Moxom, deceased, was past seventy years of age at…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Salinas v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Maier v. BrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Estate of Townsend v. TownsendSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Carl v. GabelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. German Evangelical Bethel Church of Concordia v. ReithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. In Re: Estate of Donne'ly v. AshbySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Peacock v. DuboisSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. Patterson v. McWhirkWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Bingaman v. HannahMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API