Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Sundquist
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided April 13, 1998No. 98-2222-D/VPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ORDER ASSESSING FILING FEE ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
DONALD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff, Dwayne E. Anderson, an inmate at the West Tennessee High Security Facility (WTHSF), 1 has filed a fourth complaint 2 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff is ordered to submit the $150.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order. This obligation will continue despite the…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Jacta Est Alea, Formerly Known as Uriah Marquis PashaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Sweeney v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1998
- Cary v. ALIDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- El Ahkeen v. Tony ParkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Howse v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.