Legal Opinion
Local Union No. 368 of Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators, & Paperhangers v. Barker Painting Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 6, 1928No. 4588PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
The Barker Painting Company was plaintiff below, and the Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators, and Paperhangers of America,' a national labor union, and Local Union No. '368, an affiliated local labor union, were defendants. In its bill of complaint the plaintiff recited certain regulations relating to the employment of union labor, which the defendants had adopted in their constitution and were enforcing upon their members by disciplinary measures. The plaintiff charged that the regulations were illegal, and, if enforced, would inflict irreparable injury upon plaintiff…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Oelrichs v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Tullock v. MulvaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Littleton v. BurgessWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Creek v. McManusMontana Supreme Court · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cinderella Theatre Co. v. Sign Writers' Local Union No. 591District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934
- Stanfield v. VollbehrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Taylor v. Frenkel ex rel. FrenkelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985