Legal Opinion

Marriage of Edelman v. Edelman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1984No. C3-84-776PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant-husband moved to compel respondent-wife to quit claim 40 acres of land to him in compliance with the original judgment of dissolution, which was entered pursuant to a stipulation in 1975. Respondent-wife moved to modify the judgment. The trial court declined to modify the judgment, but found it ambiguous and interpreted it, awarding the wife ten acres of the land. The husband appealed. We affirm.

FACTS

The parties were divorced in 1975. The judgment, entered pursuant to a stipulation, awarded the parties’ homestead to the husband and ordered the parties’ 3.2 bar…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stieler v. OstranderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marriage of Halverson v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Marriage of Landwehr v. LandwehrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Haala v. HaalaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Robertson v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Marriage of Halverson v. HalversonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API