Legal Opinion

Succession of Rusha

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 30, 1925No. 26278PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss.

The executor appeals from a judgment directing him to place the appellee and her children on his account for a legacy of $7,000 (net).

The trial judge did not fix the amount of the appeal bond, but allowed the appeal conditioned on the appellant furnishing bond "according to law."

The appeal bond given was for $12,000 which is more than one and a half times the amount involved (C.P. art. 575).

The appellee moves to dismiss on two grounds: (1) That the executor is without right or interest to appeal; and (2) that the amount of the appeal bond was not fixed by the judge.

I

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. Maison Blanche Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Succession of McKennaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
  3. Succession of CassidySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  4. Succession of HuxenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Giroir v. DumesnilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  2. Succession of ButterworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Succession of ShowsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  4. Succession of MaginnisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  5. Succession of ShowsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API