Legal Opinion

Succession of Huxen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1918No. 23197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; E. K. Skinner, Judge. Proceedings in the succession of Robert Iluxen, deceased. From a judgment maintaining an opposition to the account of the administratrix, she appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, C. J.

This case comes up on appeal by the administratrix of the above-entitled. succession from a judgment maintaining an opposition to her account, filed by II. T. Cottam & Co., Limited, which judgment recognizes that firm as entitled to be paid the sum. of $219 “with preference and priority over others,” as balance due, on account for “goods and merchandise” alleged to have been sold to the deceased. The appeal was first taken to the Court of Appeal, parish of Orleans, but appears to have been transferred, by order of that tribunal, to this court, upon its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. Maison Blanche Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Wunderlich v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Succession of RushaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Hamilton v. McKeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  3. In Re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  4. Creston Lumber Co. v. Estate of CockerhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Mid-South Environmental Services, Inc. v. Estate of San-DidgeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API