Legal Opinion

Gath v. Travelers' Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1925No. 18724PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

A clause in the insurance policy under consideration gave the company the right and opportunity to make an autopsy in case of death. The facts developed on the hearing disclosed that the agents of the insurance company, not only had knowledge of the death of the insured, but entertained a belief that death was caused by other than accidental means. This they had at least 30 hours before burial. The widow was the sole beneficiary under the policy, and continued to reside at the family home during the time intervening between the death and bnrial. A son who lived in Michigan was at the time at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wehle v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Johnson v. Bankers Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Root v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Danahy v. KelloggNew York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. GathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Reardon v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Schachner v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1932
  4. Travelers Ins. Co. v. GathOhio Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API