Legal Opinion

Ira Haney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1931No. 14006Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

on state’s motion for rehearing.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— From the supplemental transcript filed in connection with the State’s motion for rehearing, it is made to appear that in copying the indictment in the transcript the clerk, by inadvertance, omitted the word “fraudulently” which was, in fact, embraced in the indictment. The record, as corrected, eliminates the fault upon which the order reversing the case and ordering a dismissal was based. From the corrected record it is shown that the indictment in appropriate language charged that the appellant did “unlawfully and fraudulently take…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Haney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API