Legal Opinion

Haney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 25, 1931No. 14005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

It is alleged in the indictment that appellant “did then and there unlawfully and fraudulently take one head of cattle, belonging to Dr. A. Carmicheal, from the possession of the said Dr. A. Carmicheal, without the consent of the said Dr. A. Carmicheal, and with the intent then and there to deprive the said Dr. A. Carmicheal of the value of the same and to appropriate it to the use of him the said Ira Haney.” Appellant made no motion to quash the indictment, but now contends that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hartman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Yarbrough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Ira Haney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Rupard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API