Chang v. Beaupied (In Re Chang)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Appellee Aleta Beaupied filed a complaint against Appellant-Debtor Amy Chang (“Debtor”) seeking to have her claim in Debt- or’s bankruptcy given priority under Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) 1 § 507(a)(7). George 0. Ting filed an objection (the “Objection”) to Debtor’s Chapter 13 Plan (the “Plan”). Because of the overlapping legal and factual issues involved in the two proceedings, the bankruptcy court, with the parties’ consent, consolidated the two actions. After a trial, the bankruptcy court held that Beaupied’s and Ting’s respective debts were nondischargeable…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gleason v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beaupied v. Chang (In re Chang)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re HattonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Bryer v. Hetrick (In Re Bryer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Bendetti v. Gunness (In Re Gunness)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In Re LutzkeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.