Board of Selectmen v. County Commissioners
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
This action was brought in October, 1970, by the board of selectmen of Hull and twelve taxpayers of that town in an effort to obtain a declaration that Hull had been disproportionately assessed for county taxes through the use of the valuations established by St. 1963, c. 660, § 1, and to obtain restitution from the county of the “overcharge.” The case was completely inactive (except for changes of appearance of counsel) from 1972 to 1979. It was heard in 1980 on a “stipulation of agreed facts.” The stipulation indicated that the relief sought by the plaintiffs was limited to the fiscal years…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wickliffe's Executors v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
- Carey v. FitzpatrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Rosenfeld v. Boston Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Hinckley v. Town of BarnstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- SECOND CHURCH IN DORCHESTER v. BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. State, Division of Insurance, Department of Commerce & Economic DevelopmentAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Cookson Group plc v. FlynnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Lumarose Equipment Corp. v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Era Aviation, Inc. v. CampbellAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Board of Assessors v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.